Es war ein Mann, der hatte drei Söh

Es war ein Mann, der hatte drei Söhne und weiter nichts im Vermögen als das Haus, worin er wohnte. Nun hätte jeder gerne nach seinem Tode das Haus gehabt, dem Vater war aber einer so lieb wie der andere, da wußte er nicht, wie er's anfangen sollte, daß er keinem zu nahe tät. Verkaufen wollte er das Haus auch nicht, weil's von seinen Voreltern war, sonst hätte er das Geld unter sie geteilt.

Ergebnisse (Englisch) 1:

There was a man, who had three sons and further nothing in assets than the House, where he lived. Now everyone would have liked the House after his death, but the father was so sweet like the others, because he didn't know how it to do, he did not close. Sale he didn't want the House also, because it was his ancestors, otherwise he would have divided the money among them.

Ergebnisse (Englisch) 2:

It was a man who had three sons, and nothing else in the world but the house in which he lived. Now everyone would have liked to have the house after his death, the father was but one so dear as the other, because he did not know how to start it, that he ity not too close. He wanted to sell the house not because it was of his forefathers, else he might have divided the money amongst them.

Ergebnisse (Englisch) 3:

It was a man who had three sons and nothing else in the assets as the house in which he lived. Now everyone likes to after his death had had the house, the father was but a as he loved the other, he knew he should not, as he's starting, that indeed it is not too close. He wanted to sell the house, because it's from his forefathers did was, or else he would have divided the money among them.